![]() |
| Bell's Blended Scotch Whisky |
Everybody likes a bargain! Teacher's Highland Cream is one great deal. In the American whisky realm, Jim Beam Black is another.
I am always on the look-out for a low priced blend that delivers good value for my hard earned cash. With inflation and rising taxes eroding my purchasing power, I really have to have some reasonably priced spirits. But, when you are staring at the bottom shelf of the whisky section of your local purveyor of fine spirits, you certainly run the risk of buying some very terrible whiskies. So, you understand my motivation for picking up a bottle of Bell's Blended Scotch Whisky. Could it be another Teacher's or Jim Beam Black? Let's find out.
Price Point
Bell's Scotch Whisky is priced the same as Teacher's, J&B and Dewar's White Label. So far, so good!
Nose (undiluted)
Sweet, grassy, cookie dough and some peat.
Palate (undiluted)
Super sweet, wheat, biscuit, sugared shortbread cookies, and a little peat. Thereafter, turns malty.
Finish (undiluted)
Very short. What you experience in the blink of any eye is Cool Whip, fresh out of the cannister, a couple of salt licks, hints of peat and a grand finalie of unrivaled GRAININESS!!!!!!!!!!!
Simple, boring, terribly sweet! Flat tasting. Just no dimensions to this blended scotch. Would be suitable for mixed drinks, but on its own or with ice, it is just a huge dive into the sugar bowl of whiskies. Sure, economy blended scotch is not meant to be overly complex. I agree, but hey, that doesn't give the blenders carte blanche to create an extra boring whisky. I think this whisky exists in the marketplace because it appeals to the lowest common denominator of whiskies, namely smooth, super sweet, no playful bite and virtually no evolution from the initial cloyingly sweet beginining to the Cool Whip finish. Ugh! This is the handy choice of drunks who wake under a bridge and college students looking to get loaded.
Oh, did I say this was sweet? That's all it is. It's like a mouthful of sugar cubes slowingly melting in your mouth. Not a pleasant sugar cane or honey sweetness. No! Think high-fructose corn syrup! Gumballs, dime store candies, vending machine candy. That's the sweetness Bell's Blended Scotch Whisky exhibits! Yuck!
Graininess
Ever read a whisky tasting note and the critic speaks of tasting the 'grains' of a scotch, and you think "what the hell does grain taste like?"
As you probably know, blended whisky is made up of many grain and malt whiskies. The grain used in scotch is mainly wheat. This grain imparts a light, sweet taste and provides a narrow flavor field of sugar, vanilla and sweet toffee. If the grain whisky is young it can be harsh (tasting bitter or acidic) and lacking in much flavor because grain whisky in blends may be aged (however briefly) in poor quality casks for too short a period of time.
Grain whisky can be delightful in blended scotch, but much will hinge upon the quality of the casks. Are they first-fill ex-bourbon casks? Are casks made of American or European oak? How long are they in the casks? The quality of the wood making up the casks is just as important, if not more important than the grain making up the whisky.
Malt whisky is whisky derived from barley. Barley provides a much broader spectrum of flavors than wheat, which is probably an enormous factor in explaining the importance placed upon it. Malt whisky, especially when young, is very distinctive, and blending it with sweet grain whisky can make it more palatable. The tremendous sweetness of Bell's suggests to me that there is far too much grain whisky used and not enough malt whiskies. My theory would explain the absence of flavor in this scotch.
Returning to Bell's, when I say it is grainy, I am saying it is terribly sweet, cloyingly so. Honey sweet is nice. High-fructose corn syrup sweetness is not, unless it is the flavor quality of cough syrup you are trying to convince your 4 year old child with a fever to down.
Recommendation?
Bell's Blended Scotch Whisky is not a bottom shelf bargain. It is a terribly sweet whisky suitable for mixed drinks at best. There are no interesting flavors to be found. You just get wicked sugar, biscuits and some oak. No sherry or great treatment of peat here. No licorice, toffee flavors either.
Don't buy it!
Jason Debly
Copyright © Jason Debly, 2009-2011. All rights reserved.




Awful stuff. Was so nice as an eight year old, but the new formulation is practically undrinkable without a pile of ice. I've been thinking a lot about Canadian Whiskies these days. It is at this price point where they shine. Even the best of them are relatively uncomplicated and simplistic compared with single malts, but they are always smooth and drinkable. I don't believe that any Scotch blends (available here) are potable until you reach the level of Johnny Walker Black.
ReplyDeleteTake The Famous Grouse for instance. The label trumpets the fact that Macallan and Highland Park (albeit young) are in the mix, but combined with the equally young grain you have a spirit reminiscent of a mix of gasoline and turpentine.
In the old formulation Bell's was by far my favourite cheap blend. Now my money goes elsewhere. I don't understand it. I've heard that blenders primarily work with their noses but surely some responsible person has to taste this awful stuff. What were they thinking?
I've never tried Bell's and am very unlikely to after reading your review, but you make it sound like a contender for "worst blended scotch in the world." Perhaps it is, but I'd like to offer up another for consideration.
ReplyDeleteMany years ago, before developing much of a discerning palate and at a time when cost was king, I used to get my scotch fix swilling Clan MacGregor. That, in my estimation, is the worst blended scotch in the world and just might make Bell's taste like a significant upgrade.
Of course, one has to lower their expectations when drinking 'economy' blended scotch whiskies. One cannot compare them to single malts naturally, but Bell's is near the bottom of what I would term the 'junk scotch' pile. At the bottom might be Clan MacGregor and I would add Ballantine's Finest. And! Last, but not least is "Grant's Family Reserve!"
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting!
Howard, you are on the money about Famous Grouse, standard bottling, another grainy sweet blend. You cannot get much taste of the Highland Park and Macallan till there are some serious age statements like 12, 18 and 30yrs. I do enjoy the 18 and 30yrs.
ReplyDeleteI have heard that Bell's as an 8yr old blend was pretty decent. Pity they discontinued it.
Hey Jason,
ReplyDeleteIt does seem that the best-selling Scotch blends now fit this same formula: Light, sweet, easy drinking. The reasons why they might sell, along with marketing and as the bigger names, is as you said, the appealing to the "lowest common denominator" of whiskey drinker.
I too have been re-discovering the blend, as I may have expressed a bit in my comments earlier, trying to scope out as many of the slightly lesser-known, bang-for-the-buck blends as I can get my grubby (and cheap...well...but not too cheap...) hands on. Isle of Skye 8 and Islay Mist 8 are two respectable and very affordable discoveries. Any quick thoughts on those two?
-Yochanan
Hi Yochanan,
ReplyDeleteI have not had either one. A great blend I would recommend is Black Bottle. Worth trying.
This search of mine for good blended scotch continues . . . next up: Grant's Ale Cask Reserve
Hi Jason,
ReplyDeleteWe've selected you as our Foodista Drink Blog of the Day for tomorrow, February 1st! Your blog post regarding Bell's Blended Scotch Whiskey will be featured on the Foodista homepage for 24 hours. We've been following your blog and we are thrilled to post it on Foodista.
Since you are now a part of the Foodista Featured Drink Blogger of The Day Community, we've created a special badge for you to display proudly on your blog sidebar. Here is a link to the Featured Drink Blog of the Day code to access the special badge, unique only to Featured Foodista Drink Blogs of the Day:
http://www.foodista.com/static/dbod_badge
Besides posting your link on the homepage, we will also post a couple shout outs on our Twitter and Facebook pages. We are really enjoying your blog and look forward to seeing your recipes, tips and techniques on Foodista!
If you would not like to be recognized on Foodista please let me know and I will remove your blog from our queue.
Cheers,
Andrea
--
Andrea Mitchell
amitchell@foodista.com
Editor and Social Media Manager
www.foodista.com
http://twitter.com/foodista
http://www.facebook.com/Foodista
Foodista- The Cooking Encyclopedia everyone can edit!
Thanks Andrea!
ReplyDeleteCannot agree more, its a real shame that when many think malt brands, its labels such as this they recognise. At Hogmanay enjoying others hospitality, I found myself with your average supermarket Whyte & Mackay. Not a cheap tipple but the lingering taste was dire. You're better paying slightly more or going for a smaller bottle of a single malt.
ReplyDeleteyour comments on Graininess was educational. I never done whisky course.
ReplyDeletethe comments always funny at
http://www.masterofmalt.com/whiskies/bells-original-whisky/
I never did whisky course.
ReplyDeleteWhen i say 'grainy' i am referring to grainy feel in mouth. Love it.
Not sweet as you mention on bells review.
what term could I use correctly. I'm referring to a ballintine's.
I'm in Japan right now and have been looking for a reasonably priced whiskey so bought this one today. It cost 980 yen, or around $12 at the current exchange rate.
ReplyDeleteIt will do until I get paid and then I'll go and buy one of my favourite Irish malts.
Nice site, by the way.
I agree, this is not a great bottom shelf scotch. Just started going through the bottom scotches myself and am now 0/3 in finding a winner.
ReplyDeleteStarted neat and found no flavour to speak of, better with a little water/ice but not much. Very sweet as mentioned.
Better than Grant's, not as good as Cutty's, though I wouldn't recommend any of them.
Interesting. I am relatively new to scotch, but Bell's was not the worst I have tasted. Nothing, but nothing beats Johnny Walker Red label for the worst scotch ever! Due to budget considerations I have only purchased a few higher end single malts and have discovered that older (and more expensive) single malts cannot be beat. Glenn Fiddich 15 year is very nice compared to the 12 and when I get up the courage to spend $100 on a bottle of liquor, I will try the 18 year old.
ReplyDeleteTeachers is a nice, everyday scotch along with Johnny Walker Black. I really prefer a smokier, peaty type scotch so JW Black wins out in the lower end blends. I'm just learning and have long ways to go. Thanks for you advice.