Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Review: Crown Royal Cask No. 16

The most famous and best selling of all Canadian whiskies is, without a doubt, Crown Royal.  A brand that has been around for a long time.  It was created by Canadian entrepreneur Samuel Bronfman, who was in his day, kinda the equivalent of Donald Trump.  Astute businessman, shameless promoter, who could be generous, kind, philanthropic, nasty and ruthless.  A real piece of work.

One of the ways he left his mark in this world was through his obsession with developing a great whisky, and the result was Crown Royal.  Mr. Sam, as he was known, introduced Crown Royal to mark the state visit to Canada of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in 1939 (In my You Tube video review I incorrectly said the state visit by the King and Queen took place in the mid-1950's).  Clearly, Mr. Sam was a master of marketing, light years ahead of his time.

Sam Bronfman
















Davin de Kergommeaux, in his authoritative tome, Canadian Whisky, wrote:

"Bronfman was wealthy and well connected by that time and managed to have the whisky placed aboard the trains carrying the royal couple across Canada.  It was billed as whisky fit for royalty, but there is no evidence that either of them ever tasted it.  Still, it was an instant success with Canadians."

Bronfman continued to play up the tenuous connection to royalty by selling Crown Royal in dark blue/purple faux velvet bags.  What a card!

Brand Variations
While Crown Royal was introduced in 1939, it would be a long time before extensions of the brand would appear in the marketplace.  But, when they did, the sales were impressive, which meant more brand variations.

Crown Royal Reserve appeared in 1992.  Basically it was Crown Royal with a few older whiskies and additional rye in the mash bill for added spice.  Nice.  In 2008, the Special Reserve was re-launched as Reserve.  Other than changing the label, it was the same whisky.  Pretty poor marketing strategy.  They should have taken a page out of Mr. Sam's playbook and linked the launch with a newsworthy event in 2008.  Maybe the election of President Obama?  Or maybe the worst film sequel of 2008: Saw 5

In 2006, Crown Royal XR (extra rare) appeared on the market.  A very expensive release that continues to be bottled to this day. Good hooch, but too rich for my pocket book.

2010 brought us, Crown Royal Black and well, I don't like it.  Tastes like rum.  I like rum, but not when I buy a bottle labeled Canadian whisky.  For those occasions, I want to taste Canadian whisky.  In any event, I reviewed it here.  I was not kind.

2012 saw the release of Crown Royal Maple.  I have not tried it.  It is Crown Royal finished in maple toasted oak.  I understand sales have been very strong, much like the success of Crown Royal Black.  But remember, just as age statements are not a guarantee of quality, neither is robust sales growth.

The Main Event
Crown Royal Cask No. 16 came to market in 2007.  This whisky is basically standard Crown Royal that has been finished for a period of time in oak Cognac casks.  The number "16" refers to the forest region or district of Limousin, France, from which the oak is harvested for the barrels.  I think that is the back story, but if I am wrong, please advise in the comments section.

ABV
40%

Body
Medium body.  Rounded, creamy mouth feel.

Nose (undiluted)
Some faint rye notes, chocolate, brandy, warm fruitcake.

Palate (undiluted)
Rye bread, warm plum pudding, stewed prunes, nutmeg, oatmeal drizzled with brown sugar.

Finish (undiluted)
Dark rum soaked fruit cake.  Subtle spiced oak.

General Impressions
A beautiful Canadian whisky!  Incredibly smooth, balanced, but not boring.  The Cognac cask aging process really imparts the darker fruitcake character of this whisky.  The taste has a slight winey note that works very well.

The smooth character makes this whisky very easy to drink.  Well done!

And now for the bad news . . .
Crown Royal Cask No. 16 has been discontinued.  Production ceased in 2013.  Accordingly, once it is gone, it's gone forever.  Presently, Cask No. 16 still appears on shelves in Canada and the US, and retailers in the US are cutting the price on this great whisky.  I have seen it advertised for $52 a bottle.  A great price.

In Canada, it normally retails between $80 and $100, which is quite expensive for Canadian whisky.  Nevertheless, I paid those prices and I am not disappointed nor feel cheated.  So, if you can get it for less, you are doing well.

Why was it discontinued?  Diageo and I are not on speaking terms.  I send them emails.  They ignore them.  So, I am left to my own devices, which means talking to others in the spirits industry for their theories.  One knowledgeable source speculates that the demise of Cask No. 16 was not due to poor sales, but rather the spectacular sales growth of Crown Royal Black and Maple.  Someone in the company decided to take the resources devoted to Cask No. 16, and devote it to the growth areas of the product line.  Another theory is that the sourcing of the cognac casks might have become problematic in the future.  Who knows?  All I know is that this whisky will be gone forever, except for the bottles I manage to scoop up now.

Cheers!


Jason Debly

19 comments:

  1. Shame for losing the Cask 16. But Crown Royal Maple isn't all that good. It has sugar and flavouring listed as two of it's ingredients, so don't be fooled into thinking all of the flavour comes from a finishing in toasted maple. While it isn't as sticky, syrupy, or cloying as Jim Beam Red Stag, the maple overloads almost all of Crown Royal's regular taste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When researching this post, I tried to determine just what constituted 'maple' in Crown Royal Maple. Is it maple syrup? Maple sugar? Visit the Crown Royal Maple site and it says maple toasted oak. Are Canadian maple trees oak too? I dunno. What I do know is that in Canada, there is no legislation governing what constitutes 'maple' in whisky. It could be simply sugar and food friendly chemicals that simulate the desired flavor.

      There is a trend of late in Canadian whisky to be more flavored, just as we are seeing in American bourbon with Red Stag. Why? Sales have been very good ever since product launch. Young people like it, far more approachable than 'conventional' whisky and it makes for good mix.

      Some people like Davin de Kergommeaux think this is a good trend as it will introduce more people to whisky and they will progress to better products. I am unsure.

      Delete
  2. The Bronfman Family are friends, my sister went to school with some of them. I remember Sam and his funeral as a kid in Montreal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His funeral was attended by so many flying in from abroad that they had to cancel all other flights.

      He would have been pleased with this whisky.

      Delete
  3. Jason, I think your tasting notes are very fair generally, and in this case, they match dead on with my taste. I liked this release for its price and for its texture, at least while I was spending over $100/btl regularly. While it was available, I never did see it priced under $100 US in California. Our group formed the opinion from a couple local insiders that the Cask 16 effort was abandoned largely for falling short of annual sales goals for too long. At least, it was said to be a difficult sell here, locally, if Diageo is to be believed. Cheers, JK

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very informative review Jason, as I know next to nothing about Canadian whisky so it has prompted my interest.

    Diageo do seem to have some supply issues with their North American distilleries if the boom in demand continues from what I hear. So it sounds as if this is a sad victim of their boardroom plans. Perhaps the profit on the Cask 16 is marginal compared to other releases? I'll try and ask a relative to pick one up for me over there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope you relative can find one for you. Very good example of Canadian whisky at the top end.

      Delete
  5. Wow, I wish I would have read your comments a few weeks ago, I saw a bottle of Cask 16 for 41.00, I'm going to rush back to see if they still have some left.

    ReplyDelete
  6. whatever happened to E & J cognac?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you mean E & J Brandy. Far as I know, it is still on the market. Here is a link:

      http://www.ejbrandy.com/

      Delete
  7. I see quite a few bottles on shelves in San Diego corner stores. $90 per bottle. $450 on eBay.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have a couple of bottles I will part with diltonent@aolcom

    ReplyDelete
  9. I too, found out too late about this fine whiskey. Although I was able to find a few bottles in my state before it vanished. I have 1 partial, and two full bottles stashed for future enjoyment!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I just picked up a bottle of Cast No16, not sure if I wanna give it a taste or part with it to someone who would truly enjoy this discontinued favorite

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By any chance did you taste the Cask No. 16? If not would you like to sell it?

      Delete
    2. Jon Wilson

      jonewilson@msn.com

      717-654-5139

      Delete
  11. If you ever decide to get rid of the Cask 16 you picked up email me at kinddog47@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. My friend drank that with his father who passed away 5 years ago this year and I am trying to surprise him with a bottle. If anyone knows how I can get one, please email me at sherrylynncolford@gmail.com. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete