Showing posts with label Chivas Regal 12 year old. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chivas Regal 12 year old. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Review: Chivas Regal 18 years Blended Scotch Whisky
Snake in the Grass
You know the phrase. What does it mean? Someone who betrays your trust. That's how I feel about Chivas Regal 18 years. Please, let me explain.
I like Chivas Regal 12 years. I am a fan. I also like Royal Salute, the 21 year old blended scotch whisky offering from Chivas Brothers. So naturally, I assumed Chivas Regal 18 years would be pretty good. Ahh no! No, it is not.
Reasons? It's sweet, smooth to the point of being boring and worst of all: a tad bit grainy on the finish! Yes, I used the 'g' word, the most cutting of descriptors of an amateur scotch reviewer.
I reviewed Chivas Regal 18 years about nine months ago (read that review for a precise description of the flavor profile). I thought maybe I had been a little harsh. So, I picked up another bottle. Have been sipping and am still not impressed. What really ticks me off is the high price. At the price of Chivas Regal 18, you could buy excellent single malts at the same price or less. For example, I could have bought: Cragganmore 12, Dalwhinnie 15, Highland Park 18, Highland Park 15, Glenlivet 18 and Glenfiddich 15 years to name but a few fine bottles. Naturally, if a blended scotch whisky commands such a high price you expect to taste great quality and complexity of taste. Not so!
Some readers may say that it is unfair to compare an 18 year old blended scotch to single malts. It's like comparing apples and oranges one might say. And I say: "Rubbish!" If Chivas wants to charge the same price as single malts then it is only logical that consumers will compare their product to other products in the same price range. Nevertheless, if we turn to 18 year old blended scotch whiskies like Johnnie Walker Gold 18 yrs and Famous Grouse 18 years, both of those competitors deliver more nuanced, complex and frankly all-round superior flavor profiles. Move outside Scotland and other whiskies deliver more powerful and intriguing flavors like Jameson 18 (Irish whiskey), Yamazaki 18 (Japanese), and Gibson's Finest 18 (Canadian).
For the high price, Chivas Regal 18 years delivers disappointment at every sip. How so? Let me count the ways:
Smooth: People who do not drink a lot of scotch, namely Dads and Grandads (ok maybe Aunt May too) at holiday time, tend to place a premium on smoothness of the spirit they drink. If you drink scotch three times a year, you will like Chivas Regal 18. If you drink more frequently than that then smoothness can easily move from a positive to a negative feature. The trouble with this blend is that it is so smooth that it renders the tasting experience boring, flat, about as interesting as watching paint dry on a barnyard door. Of course none of us want to drink sharp, bitter whisky that produces welts on our tongues. But, hey! I like a little challenge. Not here.
Sweet: Novice scotch fans love sweet whiskies. Why? Again, they do not offend, especially when you imbide only a couple of times a year. Scotch for the person who hardly drinks is a challenge at the best of times and so a sweet one makes it enormously more palatable. The challenge of every scotch and whisky is to deliver an interesting interplay of sweet yet dry or tart flavors. That's not easy. Typically, quality whiskies may start sweet but finish dry. Not easy to do. Chivas Regal 18 is sweet like Barbara Walters like her smiles and opening questions in one of her soft ball, made for TV, celebrity interviews. It's also as sweet as Lionel Richie crooning: ""I'm easy like Sunday morning . . ." Ugh!
Near Total Absence of Peat: Scotch newbies generally shy away from peat and smoke flavors. Especially Islay weighted blends. No worries here. Chivas Regal 18 is sweet honey with hardly any peat. I mean hardly any! Did I say hardly any? Just in case you didn't hear: Hardly any peat! Take a big slug of Chivas 18 and there will be the flashing glimpse of peat like a meteorite unexpectedly coming into view for a few seconds on a summer night sky.
Grainy Finish: Blended scotch uses grain whiskies in order to soften the strong personality of single malts that are blended to give a core or distinct flavor profile. Grain whiskies have no flavor. Well, not entirely true. They taste like raw onions to me at their worst and at their best like carmelized onions you fry to add to your barbecued t-bone. Chivas Regal 18 has a grainy finish. Not good. Not acceptable at the price point you have to pay. If this blended scotch was 50% less than the current asking price I wouldn't complain.
Conclusion
When I drink Chivas Regal 18 I really get the sense that I am being duped. I've been tricked into trading my hard earned cash for an inferior product that comes with flashy, social climbing, snobby, elitist packaging. To make my point abundantly clear, consider the following: One of the core single malts making up Chivas Regal 18yrs is Strathisla single malt. You can buy Strathisla 12 years for nearly half the price of Chivas 18. No heavy marketing of this decent highland malt takes place. I bet you have never heard of it. Guess what? It is a helluva lot better than the blended scotch it goes into. I suspect that the profit margin on Chivas Regal 18 (that is filled in part with grain whiskies) is far greater than Strathisla 12 yrs.
Ouch! What just bit my ankle? This is getting biblical. I gotta go . . . until next time.
Cheers!
Jason Debly
Photo Credits: Chivas 18 in the Grass - Jason Debly; Barbara Walters photo - http://www.thehealthyeverythingtarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/barbara-walters-affair.jpg ; Barn Door - by Steffe at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/steffe/16532764/sizes/l/in/photostream/
Copyright © Jason Debly, 2009-2010. All rights reserved.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Review: Auchentoshan 12 year old - Single Malt Scotch Review
I had this a couple of weeks ago at a whisky tasting. It was the second one up. The first dram was from the Glen Scotia distillery and was unremarkable. The Auchentoshan was very malty and even had some complexity I thought. So, I made a mental note to buy a bottle and review it.
I bought a bottle even though a friend of mine, James, had mentioned that the Auchentoshan 10 year old was one of the worst single malts he has ever had the misfortune of tasting.
Price Point
I paid $54 for a bottle. Very reasonable in my part of the world for a 12 year old single malt.
Nose (undiluted)
A little smoke, very malty, faint pine needles.
Palate (undiluted)
Ridiculously smooth. Definitely malty. Cloves, sweet cinnamon sticks and the slightest taste of spices.
Finish (undiluted)
Oak. Very subdued zing of ground pepper and quite grainy. How a single malt can be grainy on the finish is beyond me. Especially odd when you consider grain alcohol does not make up a single malt.
Add Water?
I did. The results were not an improvement. It became slighlty bitter.
General Impressions
Not impressed. I feel like I wasted some money on this scotch. I expected something more. It did not live up to my recollection of the scotch tasting. When I buy a single malt, I expect flavors that are superior to blended scotch in the same price range. Not true in this case. I'd take Chivas Regal 12 year old over this any day of the week.
It is not a horrible whisky, just sweet, malty, flat and boring. There is nothing to this one. It is an ingredient single malt in Ballantines Finest, and quite frankly, I would also drink the latter over this.
When I compare this 12 year old single malt to other 12 year old single malts, the disappointment deepens. Highland Park 12, Cragganmore and others are light years ahead of Auchentoshan 12.
Who should buy this?
If you have never tried a single malt scotch, I could understand trying this as a novice scotch fan and enjoying it. Why? Because of the smooth texture, the complete lack of any offensive flavors, virtually no peat flavor (novices rarely enjoy big peat flavors) and just a little spice and smoke on the finish to let you know that you are drinking scotch and not cherry Coke.
Auchentoshan scotch regardless of the particular bottling, is triple-distilled like many Irish whiskies. The result is a very smooth scotch. If you prefer Irish whisky over scotch, this may be one you will enjoy. It shares many common characteristics with Irish whisky like Bushmills.
Auchentoshan 12 year old (which replaced the old 10 year old bottling) is not terrible. It has no 'bite' or 'roughness' but no memorable flavors. Again, this is one for someone new to scotch or for the ladies. Guys, if you are caught sipping this, I and others are gonna wonder where your purse is.
For me, I detected little complexity of flavor whatsoever. For unabashed scotch fans, who like some intrigue and challenge, skip this Plain Jane and continue your search for a Jayne Mansfield.
Cheers!
Jason Debly
Copyright © Jason Debly, 2009-2012. All rights reserved.
I bought a bottle even though a friend of mine, James, had mentioned that the Auchentoshan 10 year old was one of the worst single malts he has ever had the misfortune of tasting.
Price Point
I paid $54 for a bottle. Very reasonable in my part of the world for a 12 year old single malt.
Nose (undiluted)
A little smoke, very malty, faint pine needles.
Palate (undiluted)
Ridiculously smooth. Definitely malty. Cloves, sweet cinnamon sticks and the slightest taste of spices.
Finish (undiluted)
Oak. Very subdued zing of ground pepper and quite grainy. How a single malt can be grainy on the finish is beyond me. Especially odd when you consider grain alcohol does not make up a single malt.
Add Water?
I did. The results were not an improvement. It became slighlty bitter.
General Impressions
Not impressed. I feel like I wasted some money on this scotch. I expected something more. It did not live up to my recollection of the scotch tasting. When I buy a single malt, I expect flavors that are superior to blended scotch in the same price range. Not true in this case. I'd take Chivas Regal 12 year old over this any day of the week.
It is not a horrible whisky, just sweet, malty, flat and boring. There is nothing to this one. It is an ingredient single malt in Ballantines Finest, and quite frankly, I would also drink the latter over this.
When I compare this 12 year old single malt to other 12 year old single malts, the disappointment deepens. Highland Park 12, Cragganmore and others are light years ahead of Auchentoshan 12.
Who should buy this?
If you have never tried a single malt scotch, I could understand trying this as a novice scotch fan and enjoying it. Why? Because of the smooth texture, the complete lack of any offensive flavors, virtually no peat flavor (novices rarely enjoy big peat flavors) and just a little spice and smoke on the finish to let you know that you are drinking scotch and not cherry Coke.
Auchentoshan scotch regardless of the particular bottling, is triple-distilled like many Irish whiskies. The result is a very smooth scotch. If you prefer Irish whisky over scotch, this may be one you will enjoy. It shares many common characteristics with Irish whisky like Bushmills.
Auchentoshan 12 year old (which replaced the old 10 year old bottling) is not terrible. It has no 'bite' or 'roughness' but no memorable flavors. Again, this is one for someone new to scotch or for the ladies. Guys, if you are caught sipping this, I and others are gonna wonder where your purse is.
For me, I detected little complexity of flavor whatsoever. For unabashed scotch fans, who like some intrigue and challenge, skip this Plain Jane and continue your search for a Jayne Mansfield.
Cheers!
Jason Debly
Copyright © Jason Debly, 2009-2012. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


